Milton Keynes Domestic Abuse Tender 2026: Bid Strategy

Milton Keynes Domestic Abuse Support Services Tender 2026: Live Analysis of a £6.615m, 7-Lot Contract

Posted by the TenderLab Editorial Team on 13 August 2026. Last updated 13 August 2026.

Milton Keynes City Council has gone to market for its domestic abuse support system. The contract is worth £6.615m, runs for 5 years from 1 March 2027, and is procured under the open procedure of the Procurement Act 2023, light touch regime. Bids close at 12:00pm on 8 September 2026.

This is not a care contract in the CQC sense. It is a housing-related support and violence against women and girls (VAWG) service, commissioned in part to discharge the council's duty under Part 4 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. That framing changes what evaluators reward, and catches out providers arriving with a generic social care method statement. What follows is what the specification requires, how the 60/40 split is decided, and the moves that separate a funded bid from a near miss.

At a glance

- Commissioning authority: Milton Keynes City Council (unitary authority)

- Service: Domestic Abuse Support Services, three integrated components (central access point, specialist refuge accommodation, community-based outreach)

- Cohort: victims and survivors of domestic abuse and their children

- Value: £6.615m (£6,615,000)

- Term: 1 March 2027 to 29 February 2032, with a possible 2-year extension to 28 February 2034

- Procedure: open procedure, Procurement Act 2023, light touch regime

- Lots: 7 (three core service lots plus combined configurations)

- Region: UKJ12 Milton Keynes

- CPV: 85000000, 85300000, 85310000, 85312000

- Award criteria: Quality 60%, Price 40%

- Deadline: 8 September 2026, 12:00pm

- Find a Tender notice: 076142-2026

The full documents sit on Find a Tender under notice 076142-2026.

What the service delivers, and the statutory duty behind it

The contract covers three integrated components: a central access point offering information and crisis intervention, the single front door into the system; specialist refuge accommodation providing trauma-informed support to those who need to leave home; and community-based outreach for people who stay in their own homes, including digital support and target-hardening security measures.

The governing statute is the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. Its statutory definition covers physical, sexual, violent or threatening behaviour, controlling or coercive behaviour, economic abuse, and psychological, emotional or other abuse, between people aged 16 or over who are personally connected. Refuge provision is "support within safe accommodation" under Part 4 of the Act.

Part 4 places a duty on tier-one local authorities, meaning county and unitary councils, to assess the need for support within safe accommodation, commission that support, and convene a Local Partnership Board. Milton Keynes is a unitary authority, so it holds the duty directly. A bid that shows how the service feeds the council's Part 4 needs assessment and reports through the Local Partnership Board speaks the commissioner's language.

The cohort: victims, survivors and children, and trauma-informed practice

The cohort is victims and survivors of domestic abuse and their children. Under the 2021 Act, children who see, hear or experience the effects of domestic abuse are victims in their own right. A response that treats children as an add-on to the adult's support plan loses marks; evaluators expect a child-focused offer with its own assessment, safety planning and outcomes.

Trauma-informed and psychologically informed practice is the baseline, not a differentiator. What earns marks is showing how it operates: how safety planning is carried out with each person, how coercive control and economic abuse are identified and evidenced, and how the service reaches communities mainstream provision misses. By-and-for services, led by and for the communities they serve, carry weight, and partnerships that extend that reach are worth naming.

The 7-lot structure and how to choose what to bid for

There are 7 lots: three core service lots plus combined configurations. Lot 1 is the Integrated Domestic Abuse Support Service, Lot 2 the Domestic Abuse Refuge Support Service, and Lot 3 the Domestic Abuse Outreach Service. Lots 4 to 7 are combined configurations of those three services.

The lot structure is a strategic decision. A specialist refuge provider might bid Lot 2 alone; an organisation that can run the whole pathway might target Lot 1 or a combined configuration. Bid only for what you can staff and mobilise by 1 March 2027; overreaching shows up to evaluators as thin detail in the method statements.

How the 60/40 quality and price split is decided, and what evaluators reward

Award is on quality at 60% and price at 40%, the most advantageous tender under the Procurement Act 2023. Quality outweighs price: a low price cannot rescue a weak response, and a strong narrative cannot survive an unaffordable one. Model your price against the published pricing schedule, and confirm any quality threshold before you commit.

Quality is scored against the specification. High scores come from operationalised answers: named roles such as Independent Domestic Violence Advisors (IDVAs), the Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) referral route for high-risk cases, safety planning with timeframes, and worked examples that show the mechanism in action. Domestic Abuse Housing Alliance (DAHA) accreditation, the Whole Housing Approach and target hardening are the quality marks evaluators expect for the accommodation and outreach elements.

The mistakes that lose marks

The most expensive mistake is the wrong regulatory frame. This is not a CQC-regulated activity, so a response built around CQC registration and ratings signals that the provider has not read the specification.

Others recur across weak bids: treating children as a footnote rather than victims in their own right; describing trauma-informed practice as a value rather than showing how it works; leaving the Part 4 duty and the Local Partnership Board unmentioned; generic method statements with no IDVA, MARAC or safety-planning specifics; and recycled templates with placeholders left in. Missing the 12:00pm hard stop on 8 September 2026 fails the bid outright, whatever its quality. Before submission, our score my response review catches these.

A playbook to lift your score

1. Operationalise every method statement: name the role, the system, the timeframe and the referral route, then prove it with a short worked example.
2. Run the child-focused response as its own thread, with children as victims in their own right under the 2021 Act.
3. Evidence trauma-informed and psychologically informed practice through training, supervision and safety planning, not adjectives.
4. Anchor the accommodation and outreach offer in DAHA accreditation, the Whole Housing Approach and target hardening.
5. Extend by-and-for reach through named partnerships, and tie every component back to the Part 4 needs assessment and Local Partnership Board.
6. Price to the 60/40 split, then run a pre-submission review before you upload.

Mobilisation to the 1 March 2027 go-live

Award follows the 8 September 2026 deadline, and the service starts on 1 March 2027. The Procurement Act 2023 requires a mandatory standstill period, a minimum of 8 working days, before the contract is signed, so build it into the timeline.

Refuge accommodation has to be ready and safe, and staff, including IDVAs, recruited, safeguarding-trained and in post. Data-sharing agreements and MARAC integration need to be live from day one. Confirm the TUPE position in the tender pack, because incumbent staff may transfer, and that shapes both your workforce plan and your price. A mobilisation plan that names these steps against dates is itself a scored asset.

Frequently asked questions

When is the deadline for the Milton Keynes domestic abuse tender?

Bids close at 12:00pm on 8 September 2026, a hard stop on the portal. A late upload cannot be accepted, so submit early.

How much is the contract worth?

£6.615m (£6,615,000) over the initial 5-year term (1 March 2027 to 29 February 2032), with a possible 2-year extension to 28 February 2034.

How many lots are there, and can we bid for just one?

There are 7 lots: three core service lots (Lot 1 Integrated, Lot 2 Refuge, Lot 3 Outreach) plus combined configurations at Lots 4 to 7. You can target a single core lot that matches your capacity.

Who can bid for this contract?

It is an open procedure, so any provider that meets the conditions of participation can submit. As a housing-related support and VAWG service, not a CQC-regulated activity, the qualifying evidence is domestic abuse expertise, safe accommodation and outreach capability.

How is the tender scored?

Award is on the most advantageous tender, weighted Quality 60% and Price 40%. Quality is scored against the specification, price against the published pricing schedule.

What statutory duty sits behind this commission?

Part 4 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 requires tier-one authorities to assess and commission support within safe accommodation and to convene a Local Partnership Board. Milton Keynes is a unitary authority, so it holds that duty directly, and refuge provision is the "support within safe accommodation" the duty refers to.

Work with a sector-exclusive bid team

TenderLab is a sector-exclusive health and social care bid-writing consultancy, with a 92% win rate across more than 200 UK health and social care submissions. Our writers are evaluator-trained, and most of them began on the frontline of care before joining, so they write the way commissioners read. Every engagement includes a pre-submission review. We are registered at Companies House under number 17184263.

If the Milton Keynes domestic abuse contract is on your radar, book a free consultation via our contact page, whether or not we turn out to be the right fit. See how we approach bid writing and what a pre-submission review covers.

Related content

• Browse live UK health and social care tenders
• Dorset Council Care, Support, Housing and Community Safety Open Framework case study
• Score my response
• Our bid-writing service