Your CQC rating shapes whether you can bid for council and NHS care contracts, and every care provider chasing public sector work needs to know exactly how.

For some tenders, a Good rating is the floor. For others, Requires Improvement is fine with an improvement plan. In a few, a rating is not mentioned at all.

However, the rules are not set nationally, and they are not set by CQC. They are set tender by tender, and they turn on the buyer, the framework, the service type, the contract value and the risk profile of the people being supported.

This guide explains what CQC rating do you need to bid for care contracts in 2026 - including whether Requires Improvement is a barrier, how the four ratings read to a commissioner, what a newly registered provider with no rating can do, and how to read the eligibility section so you never waste a submission on a tender you were never allowed to enter.

Skip ahead to uncover:

• Does your CQC rating decide whether you can bid?
• What do the four CQC ratings signal to a commissioner in 2026?
• Can you bid for tenders with a Requires Improvement rating?
• Can you bid with an Inadequate rating or in special measures?
• Can you bid with no CQC rating as a newly registered provider?
• What do buyers accept instead of a CQC rating?
• Do all care contracts require CQC registration?
• How do you read the eligibility section of a tender?
• What do you do if your rating is the problem?
• Conclusion
• Frequently asked questions

***

Does your CQC rating decide whether you can bid?

What CQC rating do you need to bid for care contracts?

It depends on the tender. There is no single national rating threshold that applies to every care contract in England, and that is the first thing to understand.

CQC does not decide who can bid for a public contract. CQC registers and assesses regulated providers under the Health and Social Care Act 2008, and it publishes ratings. It does not set procurement rules.

The rating rule is written by the buyer, inside each individual tender. The council or NHS body running the procurement decides whether a rating is required, which ratings pass, and what happens if you do not have one.

That means the honest answer to "what rating do I need" is another question: which tender, run by which buyer, under which set of rules? A domiciliary care framework in one county may accept Requires Improvement with conditions, while a complex care contract in the next county sets Good as a hard minimum.

NOTE: two identical providers can be eligible for one tender and excluded from the next on the same day, purely because the buyers wrote different eligibility rules!

So the useful skill is not memorising a threshold that does not exist. It is learning to read the eligibility section of each tender and match it against your current position, which is exactly what a tender readiness audit is built to do.

Who sets the rating rule, CQC or the commissioner?

The commissioner. This is the point that trips up most providers new to public sector work.

Local authority care tenders are run under the Procurement Act 2023, which took effect in February 2025 and now governs how councils buy adult social care. NHS and Integrated Care Board (ICB) healthcare services are commissioned under the Provider Selection Regime (PSR) 2023, a separate set of rules.

Under both regimes, the buyer sets the selection criteria and the exclusion grounds. A CQC rating requirement, where one exists, sits inside those buyer-written criteria - not inside any CQC rulebook.

That is why you will see the same rating treated differently across tenders. One buyer treats a rating as a pass or fail gate. Another treats it as scored quality evidence. A third asks for it only as background information.

Is there a legal minimum CQC rating to win a contract?

No. No statute sets a minimum rating for winning a care contract, and you should be wary of anyone who tells you otherwise.

The Care Act 2014 places duties on local authorities to shape a sustainable, diverse care market and to meet assessed needs. It does not impose a national rating floor on the providers they contract with.

What the law does require is that the procurement is run fairly and transparently. If a buyer sets a rating requirement, it must apply that requirement consistently to every bidder in that procurement.

So the "minimum" you face is real, but it is local and specific. It is the minimum this buyer wrote into this tender - and it can change at the next one.

What do the four CQC ratings signal to a commissioner in 2026?

What are the four CQC ratings and what does each mean?

Outstanding, Good, Requires Improvement, Inadequate. Those are the four ratings on the CQC scale, and commissioners read each one as a shorthand for risk.

CQC assesses regulated services against the single assessment framework, which is built around quality statements and five key questions: is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led? Each of those questions carries a rating, and they combine into the overall rating.

Here is what each rating tends to say to the person scoring your bid:

• Outstanding signals a provider performing well beyond the expected standard, with strong evidence and few concerns. It is a differentiator, not just a pass.
• Good signals a service meeting expectations across the five key questions. For most tenders this is the comfortable position, and it clears the majority of rating thresholds.
• Requires Improvement signals that one or more areas fall short of expectations. It does not mean unsafe, but it flags risk that a commissioner will want addressed.
• Inadequate signals serious, widespread or unresolved concerns. It is the rating most likely to trigger exclusion and, in some cases, enforcement action from CQC.

The rating you hold is a starting position, not a verdict on the bid you can write. A Good provider can still lose to a Requires Improvement provider who evidences the specification better, and we have seen exactly that.

How much weight do commissioners actually give the CQC rating?

Less than most providers assume. The rating is one input, and rarely the whole decision.

In a typical care tender, the CQC rating sits in the selection stage as either a gate or a small scored element. The larger share of the marks usually sits in the quality method statements, where you describe how you will actually deliver the service.

That matters because it changes where you should spend your effort. A strong rating will not rescue thin, generic method statements, and a weaker rating can be offset by answers that mirror the specification and carry named operational evidence.

Our bid writing service is built on that reality: we write specification-mirrored method statements with named roles, timeframes and evidence, because that is where most tenders are won or lost.

What signals does a rating send beyond the number itself?

Consistency and trajectory. Commissioners do not only read the rating - they read the story around it.

A provider that moved from Requires Improvement to Good tells a story of a service that responds to feedback and improves. A provider that slipped from Good to Requires Improvement tells a different story, and you need to get ahead of it in the bid.

Commissioners also look at the individual key question ratings under the overall one. A Good service that is Requires Improvement in "well-led" invites questions about governance, and a smart bid answers those questions before they are asked.

So treat your rating as a narrative, not a label. The pre-submission review stage exists partly to make sure that narrative is addressed head-on rather than left for an evaluator to fill in.

Is CQC changing how it rates providers in 2026?

Yes, and you need to frame it carefully. CQC is piloting a revised approach to assessment, and the pilot runs from June to October 2026.

Here is the point that keeps you accurate in a bid: pilot judgements carry no legal standing. The current single assessment framework, its quality statements and the four ratings of Outstanding, Good, Requires Improvement and Inadequate remain the operative system while the pilot runs.

You can read CQC's own material on the direction of travel through its consultation on improving how it assesses and rates providers. Treat anything not yet published and adopted as proposed, not live.

The safe wording for a tender is straightforward. Commit to the fundamental standards and the current framework, and commit to transitioning as the new approach rolls out. Never describe an unpublished framework as though it already governs your service.

NOTE: describing a pilot or draft framework as "live" in a bid is a factual error an evaluator can catch, and it costs you credibility on every other claim you make!

Can you bid for tenders with a Requires Improvement rating?

Can you bid with a Requires Improvement CQC rating?

Usually, yes. A Requires Improvement rating does not automatically shut you out of public sector care tenders, and many providers assume it does when it does not.

The usual position is that Requires Improvement is not an automatic exclusion. Plenty of buyers will accept a bid from a Requires Improvement provider, particularly where you can show the concerns are being addressed and the service remains safe.

What varies is the conditions attached. Some buyers accept Requires Improvement outright. Others accept it only alongside a credible improvement plan. A minority set Good as a hard floor and exclude anything below it.

So the answer to "can you bid with requires improvement CQC" is: read the tender, because the tender decides. Do not self-exclude on an assumption, and do not assume you are safe without checking the eligibility wording.

What do commissioners usually do with a Requires Improvement bid?

They look for evidence of grip. A commissioner faced with a Requires Improvement provider wants to know one thing above all: is this under control?

They will typically look at three things. First, which key questions drove the rating - a Requires Improvement in "responsive" reads very differently from one in "safe". Second, how recent the assessment was. Third, what you have done since.

That third point is where you win or lose. A provider who can show a dated, specific action plan with named owners and completed milestones is a very different prospect from one who simply hopes the evaluator will not notice.

The buyer is managing risk on behalf of vulnerable people. Give them the evidence that lets them take you on without carrying that risk, and Requires Improvement stops being a barrier.

How do you bid well with a Requires Improvement rating?

Address it directly, early, with evidence. The worst thing you can do is stay silent and hope, because silence reads as either denial or disorganisation.

Here is the approach we use when a client bids from a Requires Improvement position:

1. Name the rating and the date. Do not bury it. State it plainly so the evaluator trusts everything else you say.
2. Explain the root cause in one or two sentences. Not excuses - a clear-eyed account of what fell short and why.
3. Show the improvement plan. Dated actions, named owners, and the governance route that monitors them, ideally mapped to the CQC quality statements the concerns related to.
4. Evidence progress already made. Completed actions, audit results, training records, retention figures - whatever proves the plan is real and moving.
5. Connect it to this service. Show how the improvements make you a safer, stronger choice for the specific people in this contract.

That structure turns a weakness into a demonstration of good governance. An evaluator who sees a provider managing a Requires Improvement rating well often scores the governance answers higher than a Good provider who is complacent about theirs.

Does an improvement plan actually help the score?

Often, materially. A credible improvement plan does two jobs at once, and both help you.

It clears the eligibility hurdle where the buyer conditions acceptance of Requires Improvement on a plan. And it strengthens your well-led and governance method statements, because it is direct evidence that your quality systems work.

The plan has to be real, though. Evaluators read a lot of improvement plans, and a generic one with vague dates and no named owners does more harm than good.

This is exactly the kind of document our pre-submission review stress-tests, because a plan that convinces you internally is not always the plan that convinces an evaluator who has never met you.

Can you bid with an Inadequate rating or in special measures?

Can you bid for contracts with an Inadequate CQC rating?

Usually no. An Inadequate rating is the position most likely to exclude you from a public sector care tender, and you should expect that going in.

Most buyers treat Inadequate as an automatic exclusion at the selection stage. The reason is straightforward: Inadequate signals serious or widespread concerns, and a commissioner placing vulnerable people cannot easily justify the risk.

Where a provider is in special measures, the position is usually firmer still. Special measures means CQC has judged the service to require significant, monitored improvement, and many tenders exclude special measures explicitly.

So if you hold Inadequate, the realistic answer to most tenders is that this is not your moment to bid. That is not a permanent verdict - it is a statement about eligibility right now.

Are there any exceptions where an Inadequate provider can bid?

Rarely, and narrowly. Exceptions exist, but you should not build a pipeline around them.

A few situations can leave a door open. A tender may separate the rated location from a new, unrated part of your business. A buyer running an urgent or contingency procurement may weigh continuity of care differently. And in some cases, a rating under active appeal or overtaken by a very recent reinspection changes the picture.

Even then, the bar is high. You would need clear evidence that the concerns are resolved or ring-fenced, and you would need the tender rules to permit it.

We would rather tell you not to bid than take your fee for a submission you cannot win. Where Inadequate makes a tender unwinnable, we say so - and we point you at the evidence work that changes the position for the next one.

What should you do while you hold an Inadequate rating?

Fix the service and build the evidence. The most valuable use of this period is not chasing tenders you cannot win - it is getting to a rating that reopens the market.

That means working through the CQC concerns systematically, evidencing every improvement, and preparing for reinspection. It also means keeping the documentation that a future bid will need: audits, action plans, training records and outcomes data.

When your rating recovers, those records become the backbone of a strong bid. The providers who come back fastest are the ones who treated the Inadequate period as evidence-gathering, not downtime.

Can you bid with no CQC rating as a newly registered provider?

Can a newly registered provider with no CQC rating bid for contracts?

Often, yes. Bidding with no CQC rating is a real route, and newly registered providers win public sector care work more often than the sector assumes.

A newly registered provider frequently has no rating simply because CQC has not yet carried out a first assessment. That is a normal stage, not a red flag, and many buyers understand it.

The question is whether the specific tender allows for it. Some buyers require a published rating and exclude the unrated. Many others accept unrated providers where you can supply alternative quality evidence in place of a rating.

So "bidding with no CQC rating" is not a dead end. It is a route that depends entirely on how the tender handles providers who have not yet been assessed, which is the first thing to check.

Why do newly registered providers have no rating yet?

Because assessment follows registration, not the other way around. Understanding this helps you frame it correctly in a bid.

To deliver a regulated activity - personal care, for example - you must first be registered with CQC. Registration confirms you have met the requirements to operate. The rating comes later, once CQC has assessed the service in practice.

There can be a meaningful gap between registering and being rated. During that gap, you are a fully legitimate, registered provider who simply has no published rating yet.

Frame it exactly that way in a bid. You are registered and lawfully operating; you are awaiting your first assessment; and here is the evidence that shows the quality a rating will later confirm.

How does a newly registered provider tender without a rating?

By substituting evidence for the rating. A newly registered provider tender succeeds when you replace the missing rating with proof of the same underlying quality.

The logic is simple. The rating is a proxy for "is this service safe and well run". If you cannot offer the proxy, offer the thing itself - direct evidence that your service is safe and well run.

That evidence usually includes your registration confirmation, your policies and procedures, your staffing and training arrangements, and the experience of your registered manager and leadership team. It can also include comparable experience from elsewhere.

Buyers who accept unrated providers are, in effect, asking you to prove the quality a rating would otherwise summarise. Our tender readiness audit maps exactly which of these evidence items you hold and which you need to build before you bid.

Can a brand-new provider win its first council contract without a rating?

Yes, with the right tender and the right evidence. It happens, and it is one of the most common questions new providers ask us.

The key is targeting. A brand-new provider should focus on tenders that explicitly allow unrated providers and that weight quality evidence you can actually supply. Bidding into a tender that demands a Good rating you do not have wastes everyone's time.

The evidence then has to carry the weight the rating would normally carry. Strong policies, a credible registered manager, a clear mobilisation plan and comparable experience combine into a picture a commissioner can trust.

If you are at this stage, our guide on how to become an approved care provider for your local council walks through the approved-provider route in detail, and it pairs closely with everything in this section.

What do buyers accept instead of a CQC rating?

What evidence can replace a CQC rating in a bid?

Documented proof of the same qualities. When a buyer accepts alternatives to a rating, they are asking for evidence that stands in for it, and there is a fairly standard set.

The most common accepted evidence includes:

• Registration confirmation. Proof that you are registered with CQC for the regulated activity in question - the baseline for any regulated service.
• Policies and procedures. Your safeguarding, medication, health and safety, and quality assurance policies, showing the systems a rating would test.
• A mock or independent inspection. A commissioned quality audit against the CQC framework, giving the buyer an external read on your service.
• An improvement plan. For providers below Good, a dated, owned plan that shows the service is on a clear trajectory.
• References. Contactable references from previous or current commissioners, funders or partner organisations.
• Comparable experience. Evidence of delivering similar services to a similar cohort, even where the current entity is newly registered.
• DBS and registration evidence. Enhanced DBS checks, professional registrations and safer recruitment records that show a safe workforce.

No single item replaces a rating on its own. It is the combination - registration, policies, workforce evidence and experience - that gives a commissioner confidence.

Do mock inspections help when you have no rating?

They can help a lot. A mock inspection gives an unrated or newly registered provider something close to the external validation a rating provides.

A good mock inspection assesses your service against the CQC single assessment framework and its quality statements, then produces a written report. That report is evidence a buyer can weigh in place of a published rating.

It also does something useful internally: it tells you where you actually stand before an evaluator - or the real CQC assessment - tells you. Surprises in a mock inspection are far cheaper than surprises in a live tender.

Just be honest about what it is. A mock inspection is an independent quality audit, not a CQC rating, and you should present it as exactly that.

How much do policies and procedures matter without a rating?

Enormously, because they carry more weight when there is no rating to lean on. For an unrated provider, your policy suite is a large part of how a buyer judges quality.

Buyers are not looking for a folder of generic templates. They are looking for policies that are current, specific to your service, and clearly used in practice rather than sitting on a shelf.

The strongest submissions connect the policy to the practice. Do not just state that you have a medication policy - show the competency checks, the audit cycle and the named lead who owns it.

That connection is what separates a provider who has policies from a provider who runs on them, and evaluators reward the difference.

Can comparable experience stand in for a rating?

Yes, and it is undervalued. Comparable experience is one of the strongest alternatives to a rating, especially for providers who are new as a legal entity but not new to care.

Many newly registered providers are led by people with years of sector experience. A registered manager who has run a Good or Outstanding service elsewhere brings a track record that a commissioner can weigh, even under a new registration.

The trick is to evidence it properly, with the roles, the settings, the cohorts and the outcomes named specifically rather than asserted in the abstract. Vague claims of experience persuade no one.

Our guide on how to get your first council care contract even without references goes deep on turning comparable experience into contract-winning evidence when your formal track record is thin.

Do all care contracts require CQC registration?

Do you need CQC registration to tender for care contracts?

For regulated activities, yes. Whether you need CQC registration to tender depends on whether the service is a regulated activity - and most personal care is.

CQC registration is a legal requirement to carry on a regulated activity, not merely a nice-to-have for tenders. Regulated activities include personal care, accommodation with nursing or personal care, and treatment of disease, disorder or injury, among others.

If a tender is for a regulated activity, you must be registered to deliver it lawfully. A buyer will not - and cannot - award a regulated service to a provider who is not registered for it.

So for most council and NHS care contracts involving hands-on personal care, CQC registration is not optional. It is the entry ticket, and the rating question only arises after you hold it.

What is the difference between regulated and non-regulated care activity?

Whether CQC has to register it. This distinction decides whether registration is a legal requirement for a given service.

Regulated activities are the specific activities listed in law that require CQC registration - personal care, nursing care and similar. Deliver one of these without registration and you are operating unlawfully.

Non-regulated activities fall outside CQC's registration scope. Examples can include some purely social support, certain community and wellbeing services, and support that does not involve personal care as CQC defines it.

For a non-regulated service, a tender cannot require a CQC rating, because the activity does not attract registration in the first place. In those tenders the buyer relies on other quality evidence entirely, and you should not offer a rating you have no basis to hold.

Do domiciliary care and supported living need CQC registration?

It depends on the activity, not the label. This is where providers most often get the registration question wrong, so it is worth being precise.

Domiciliary care that includes personal care - help with washing, dressing, eating, medication - is a regulated activity and requires CQC registration. If you deliver personal care in someone's home, you must be registered, as our domiciliary care bid support work reflects.

Supported living is more nuanced. The accommodation itself is generally not the regulated activity, but where personal care is provided as part of the support, that personal care element is regulated and requires registration.

So the honest test for supported living providers is not "is this called supported living" but "does this service include personal care as CQC defines it". If it does, registration applies to that element, and the rating question follows from there.

Are children's services rated by CQC or Ofsted?

Ofsted, not CQC. This is a hard line that keeps your bids accurate, and mixing the two undermines your credibility instantly.

Children's social care - children's homes, supported accommodation for 16 and 17 year olds, fostering and similar - is regulated and inspected by Ofsted, not CQC. Ofsted uses its own inspection framework and its own judgement grades.

That means everything in this guide about CQC ratings applies to adult social care and some health services, not to children's provision. If you bid for children's services, the eligibility question turns on your Ofsted judgement, not a CQC rating.

Keep the two strictly separate in every bid. A children's tender that asks about your regulatory standing wants your Ofsted position, and referencing a CQC rating there signals you have not understood the sector you are bidding into.

How do you read the eligibility section of a tender?

Where do you find the CQC rating requirement in a tender?

In the selection stage documents. The rating requirement, if there is one, lives in a predictable set of places, and knowing where to look saves you from wasted bids.

Start with the selection questionnaire or the pre-qualification section, where exclusion grounds and minimum requirements sit. Then read the specification and any quality or method statement instructions, where a rating may appear as scored evidence rather than a gate.

Also check the instructions to bidders and any pass or fail criteria table. Buyers often state rating requirements as explicit pass or fail conditions, and missing one of these is how providers get disqualified after doing all the work.

If the documents are silent on ratings, that silence usually means the buyer is not gating on a rating - but confirm it through clarification rather than assuming, because a wrong assumption here is expensive.

How do you tell if a rating is a hard requirement or just scored?

Read the language and the location. The distinction between a gate and a scored element changes your whole approach, and the wording tells you which you are facing.

A hard requirement usually reads in pass or fail language: "bidders must hold a CQC rating of Good or above", or "providers rated Inadequate will be excluded". It sits among the mandatory criteria, and failing it ends your bid regardless of quality.

A scored element reads differently. It appears among the evaluated questions, often with marks attached, and a lower rating costs you points rather than eligibility. Here, strong evidence elsewhere can offset a weaker rating.

Get this wrong and you either waste a bid you were never eligible to submit, or you talk yourself out of a tender you could have won on quality. When the wording is ambiguous, submit a clarification question - buyers are obliged to answer.

What questions should you ask before committing to a bid?

The eligibility questions, before the effort questions. A short checklist at the start protects you from pouring days into an unwinnable submission.

Ask yourself:

1. Does this tender require a CQC rating at all? If not, the rating question falls away and other evidence carries the weight.
2. Is the requirement a gate or scored? A gate you must clear; a scored element you can offset.
3. Does my current rating meet it? Compare your actual position - overall and by key question - against the stated requirement.
4. If not, does the tender allow alternatives or improvement plans? Many do, and this is where an unrated or Requires Improvement provider stays in the game.
5. Is this a regulated activity I am registered for? Without the right registration, the rating question never even arises.

Run that checklist before you write a word. It is the fastest way to stop wasting bids, and it is the backbone of how we triage opportunities for clients. Our guide on which tenders you should bid for turns this triage into a repeatable process.

What happens if you bid despite not meeting the rating requirement?

You get disqualified, and you learn nothing useful. Bidding into a gate you cannot clear is the most avoidable way to lose a tender.

Where a rating is a hard pass or fail requirement and you do not meet it, the buyer will exclude your bid at the selection stage. Your quality answers are never even read, however strong they are.

That is wasted time, wasted money and, sometimes, a mark against you with a buyer you will meet again. It also tells you nothing about how your bid writing is landing, because it was never evaluated.

Far better to identify the mismatch early and either find a tender you are eligible for or fix the underlying issue first. Honesty about eligibility is not defeatism - it is how you protect your win rate.

What do you do if your rating is the problem?

How do you improve your position before the next tender?

Build the evidence base deliberately. If your rating is holding you back, the goal is to strengthen your position before the next relevant opportunity opens, not to bid regardless and hope.

That work splits into two streams. One is improving the service itself so the rating recovers over time. The other is assembling the evidence a bid needs now - policies, audits, training records and outcomes data - so you are ready the moment you are eligible.

Both streams matter because tenders do not wait for your reinspection. A provider who has the evidence ready can move fast when the right tender appears, while an unprepared one scrambles and misses the deadline.

This is where a structured plan beats good intentions. Drifting toward the next tender without a plan is how providers end up bidding from the same weak position twice.

What does a 90-day evidence plan look like before a tender?

Focused, dated and owned. A 90-day evidence plan gives you a realistic runway to strengthen your bidding position before the next opportunity, and structure is what makes it work.

A workable shape looks like this:

• Days 1 to 30: audit and gaps. Map your current evidence against what tenders in your pipeline require. Identify the missing pieces - policies, audit trails, training records, references - and assign each an owner.
• Days 31 to 60: build and evidence. Close the gaps. Update policies against the CQC quality statements, run internal audits, refresh training, gather references, and commission a mock inspection if you have no rating.
• Days 61 to 90: package and rehearse. Assemble the evidence into bid-ready form, draft the improvement narrative if you are below Good, and stress-test it against a live specification.

By day 90 you are not hoping you can bid - you know what you can evidence and where you still cannot. That clarity is worth more than another rushed, weak submission.

Our tender readiness audit is built around exactly this kind of 90-day evidence plan, because most providers who lose on eligibility lost weeks before the deadline, not on the day.

How does workforce evidence strengthen a weaker rating?

It shows the service is safe where it counts. Workforce evidence is one of the most persuasive things you can put in front of a commissioner when your rating is not doing the work for you.

Commissioners worry about safe staffing, and rightly. Evidence of safer recruitment, enhanced DBS checks, a full training matrix and stable retention speaks directly to that worry, regardless of your headline rating.

The current market makes this even more pointed. Skills for Care's State of the Adult Social Care Sector 2025 reported a vacancy rate of 6.2% and a turnover rate of 23.6%, rising to 24.7% among independent providers - so a provider who can evidence stability stands out.

Pay is part of that picture too. With the National Living Wage rising to £12.71 an hour from 1 April 2026, buyers are alert to how providers fund and sustain their workforce, and clear evidence here reassures them.

When should you not bid at all?

When the eligibility gap is real and unbridgeable for now. Knowing when not to bid is a skill, and it protects both your money and your win rate.

If a tender sets a hard rating requirement you cannot meet, allows no alternatives, and closes before your position can change, the honest answer is to sit it out. Bidding anyway spends resources on a certain exclusion.

We tell clients when not to bid, even though a "no" earns us nothing on that tender. A consultancy that only ever says "yes, bid" is selling submissions, not results.

The better move is usually to fix the underlying issue, build the evidence, and target the next eligible tender from a position of strength. A missed tender you were never going to win is not a loss - it is a bid you were right not to write.

🎯 Conclusion

There is no single CQC rating that lets you bid for every care contract, and any answer that gives you one number is wrong. The rating rule is written into each tender by the buyer, under the Procurement Act 2023 for councils and the Provider Selection Regime for NHS and ICB services.

Good and Outstanding clear most thresholds. Requires Improvement is usually workable, especially with a credible, dated improvement plan. Inadequate and special measures usually exclude you, with only narrow exceptions. And a newly registered provider with no rating can often bid where the tender accepts alternative quality evidence.

The skill that protects your win rate is not memorising a threshold that does not exist. It is reading the eligibility section of each tender, matching it honestly against your position, and building the evidence to close any gap before the deadline rather than after it.

If your rating is the problem, a structured 90-day evidence plan usually does more for your pipeline than another rushed submission. Get eligible first, then bid to win - and know which tenders to leave alone.

Frequently asked questions

What CQC rating do you need to win council care contracts?

There is no single required rating. Councils set the rule per tender under the Procurement Act 2023. Good and Outstanding clear most thresholds, Requires Improvement is often accepted with an improvement plan, and Inadequate usually excludes you. Always read the specific tender's eligibility section rather than assuming a national minimum exists.

Can you bid for tenders with a Requires Improvement rating?

Usually yes. Requires Improvement is rarely an automatic exclusion, and many buyers accept it, particularly alongside a dated, owned improvement plan showing the service is safe and improving. Some tenders set Good as a hard floor, so check the eligibility wording first. Address the rating directly and early in the bid.

Can a newly registered provider with no CQC rating bid for contracts?

Often yes. Newly registered providers frequently have no rating because CQC has not yet assessed them, which is a normal stage. Where a tender accepts alternative quality evidence - registration, policies, workforce records, comparable experience - an unrated provider can bid and win. Target tenders that explicitly allow unrated providers.

Do you need CQC registration to tender for care contracts?

For regulated activities, yes. Personal care, nursing care and similar activities legally require CQC registration, so a buyer cannot award them to an unregistered provider. Non-regulated services fall outside registration and cannot require a rating. Children's services are regulated by Ofsted, not CQC, so a different regime applies there entirely.

Will the 2026 CQC changes affect tender eligibility?

Not yet in law. CQC is piloting a revised assessment approach from June to October 2026, but pilot judgements carry no legal standing. The current single assessment framework and the four ratings remain operative. In bids, commit to the fundamental standards and the current framework, and to transitioning as the new approach rolls out.

Can you bid with an Inadequate CQC rating?

Usually no. Most buyers treat Inadequate, and special measures, as an automatic exclusion because of the risk to vulnerable people. Rare exceptions exist - an unrated new part of the business, an urgent procurement, or a rating overtaken by reinspection - but the bar is high. Focus first on recovering the rating.

Does a CQC rating matter more than the method statements?

Usually not. In most care tenders the rating is one input at the selection stage, while the larger share of marks sits in the quality method statements. A weaker rating can be offset by specification-mirrored answers with named evidence, and a strong rating will not rescue thin, generic responses.

How do I check whether a tender requires a specific CQC rating?

Read the selection questionnaire, the pass or fail criteria and the specification. A hard requirement appears in mandatory pass or fail language; a scored element appears among evaluated questions with marks attached. If the documents are silent or ambiguous, submit a clarification question, which the buyer is obliged to answer.

---

Not sure where to start with your next bid?

We read the eligibility section first and tell you honestly whether your rating clears the tender - and if it does not, we build the 90-day evidence plan that gets you there. 92% win rate across 200+ submissions in UK health and social care. We are bid writers who have sat on the other side of the scoring table, and we were awarded a place on the Essex County Council Live at Home 2025 Framework. Companies House 17184263.

Book a free consultation to talk through your next tender (whether or not we are the right fit for it).

Related content

• How to Become an Approved Care Provider for Your Local Council
• How to Get Your First Council Care Contract (Even Without References)
• Which Tenders Should You Bid For? Care Provider Guide
• Tender Readiness Audit
• Bid Writing Services for UK Care Providers