info@tenderlab.co.uk01707 240393
Read our Google reviewsFind us on Trustpilot

Domiciliary Care · Framework

Essex County Council domiciliary care tender case study

Tier 2 places secured across five priority Essex districts in a single window. Standstill cleared without challenge.

Redacted award evidence for Essex County Council case study
Starting positionTier 1 not achievable, no FW footprint
Recorded result5 of 5 Tier 2 lots awarded
Procurement contextEssex CC, Procurement Act 2023

The starting point

Essex Live at Home Domiciliary Framework 2025 : Five Tier 2 Lots

Tier 1 not achievable at close. Digital systems active operationally but unpacked for evaluator review.

From no Essex framework footprint → awarded 5 Tier 2 lots.

Redacted source material

Inspect the evidence supporting the result.

The gallery retains the source documents already published for this case. Names, identifiers and commercially sensitive details may be redacted.

Source: Essex County Council outcome letter issued via Essex Supplier Portal, reference 1038 / 2025/S 000-019527.

01

Case Overview

This case study analyses the route Choices Healthcare Limited took onto Essex County Council's Live at Home domiciliary framework, securing Tier 2 places across five priority districts in a single window under the Procurement Act 2023. Tier 1 entry was not achievable due to the in-area CQC rating profile at close, and the digital systems evidence that would have supported a stronger technology score had not been packaged for evaluator review.

04

Starting Gaps & Limitations

The CQC rating gap made Tier 1 unreachable at first close. Beyond the tier ceiling, the digital systems evidence — active and operationally documented — had not been surfaced in the format the evaluator required. The social value commitments had not been quantified against the Council's published Social Value Model requirements, and the method statements needed reframing from internal operational language into procurement-register evidence.

08

Our Role

We took the engagement as lead writer on all quality method statements, the digital systems evidence section, and the Social Value quantification. The provider supplied the operational substance. We packaged it into a Tier 2 submission that cleared the scoring threshold across all five districts, with a documented Tier 1 path built for the next refresh window.

12

What Changed the Trajectory

The digital systems evidence was unpacked from operational documentation and restructured against the evaluator's specific scoring criteria. Social value commitments were quantified against the Council's model. The method statements were rewritten to the scoring rubric band descriptions rather than to internal operational language. The combination pushed the quality scores above the Tier 2 threshold across all five lots applied for.

13

Outcome Achieved

Choices Healthcare was confirmed onto Tier 2 across all five lots: Lot 1 Basildon, Lot 2 Braintree, Lot 4 Castle Point, Lot 6 Colchester and Lot 10 Rochford. The outcome letter was issued through the Essex Supplier Portal. The standstill closed without challenge and the framework went live for call-off opportunities.

Recorded evaluation data

Scores or lot outcomes available for this case.

The table reproduces the structured result held in the case-study record.

LotDistrictTierOutcome
Lot 1BasildonTier 2Awarded
Lot 2BraintreeTier 2Awarded
Lot 4Castle PointTier 2Awarded
Lot 6ColchesterTier 2Awarded
Lot 10RochfordTier 2Awarded

Before the engagement

The provider had no live framework presence in the five priority Essex districts and a limited inbound referral pipeline within Essex County Council commissioning. Tier 1 entry was not achievable due to the in-area CQC rating profile at close.

After the recorded outcome

The provider holds Tier 2 framework places across Basildon, Braintree, Castle Point, Colchester and Rochford, with direct access to Council referral routes within the framework. The backbone evidence pack sits inside the organisation for future refresh windows.

A comparable result is not a guarantee

Let us check whether your tender is a responsible fit first.

We will read the published conditions and assess the evidence, delivery and commercial position before agreeing to full writing support.

Share the opportunity